Nico Muhly: "Marnie" and Artistic Intent


Having Nico speak to forum was a real treat for me – as you may recall, his Mothertongue was my selection for our “one minute of music” presentation last semester. There were many great these he spoke about, including managing a large workload, his musical aesthetics, building a website with "not-boring" headshots, and overviews of some of his recent works. Having seen Marnie recently, I was particularly excited to hear about this. To be perfectly honest, I have never found opera musically appealing, but when I saw Marnie open at the Met this past October, I was completely fascinated. Many things struck me about this work and left me curious to how Nico made these decisions. Luckily, he touched on most of them in his presentation.

Musically and conceptually, the Shadow Marnies were a highlight of the entire production. In a genre marked by its heavy vibrato, to hear the opposite extreme on the stage of the Metropolitan Opera was extremely refreshing. After watching, my assumption was that the straight-tone singing was simply an aesthetic choice (and perhaps it partially was), but it was interesting to hear that it was also a practical decision to separate them from the other singers as being from “another world”. While I don’t expect opera to become a straight-tone genre anytime soon, I do wonder if it will gain any traction. I understand the bel canto style has practical use in terms of projection and strain, but I also find it do be what makes so many people steer clear of the genre. If a composer as successful as Nico Muhly struggles to get his performers on board, will lesser known composers be able to negotiate? Will his success in using this technique give other composers leverage in adopting this sound?

Something that initially bothered me about the production was that Marnie’s [spoiler alert] attempted rapist / forced husband is often presented as a good guy. He’s given beautiful songs with sweet texts, which musically attracts the audience to him. I found myself having to remind myself of his actions to avoid liking him at times. While Nico did not speak on this in class, I did ask him about this character treatment afterwards. Nico claims that he and his collaborators deliberately made this character likeable to force the audience to struggle with their emotions. If they had kept him in a negative light the entire time, it wouldn’t take any thought to dislike him. By giving him attractive characteristics, audience members must decide for themselves that he’s a bad person. In fact, they have to make these rationalizations about most characters in the opera—everyone is morally ambiguous, including Marnie.

This feels much more like real life than a traditional Mozart opera where each character is a caricature of good or evil. However, this can pose a problem for artists: when we shed an ambiguous light on characters in this manner, many people interpret it as us being personally forgiving of them. Several reviews of Marnie claimed it was too forgiving, and even I felt this way until I heard Nico’s explanation. So how do we walk the line of clear intent and intellectually challenging our audience? Perhaps that’s what makes each of our artistic voices unique.

Comments

  1. It is very interesting to hear what Nico told you about how he approached the character of the husband. I think it's amazing when composers (artists) create these juxtapositions that challenge the audience's perception.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm glad that Nico was such a great influence. Operas are so hard.. like soooo hard to do really well. Also, completely agree on the shadow Marnies. No vibrato "early" style is some great stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Really interesting observations! I found the straight-tone delivery very refreshing, and I'm an advocate for future works with this style! The characters were very well-thought-out, and I'm not surprised to see that he and his collaborators put a lot of thought into how the audience would portray them. Even though we only saw snippets of the work, it was easy to get a good snapshot of the characters from the clips he showed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's really wonderful to hear about your thoughts on opera, and on vibrato specifically. I know that many people dislike the genre because of that element specifically, as you said. I did my undergrad in vocal performance at Oberlin, so naturally I sang a lot of opera. For the most part the teachers insisted that we always sing with vibrato, in order to achieve a legato line, and for vocal health (it's easy with straight tone to accidentally apply too much pressure). However, towards the end of my time at Oberlin I started singing early music and was using less and less vibrato. In the process, I actually found a better way of singing overall, since i think vibrato can cloud and disguise problems with vocal placement. But anyway. I didn't see Marnie live, but really did enjoy the vocal approach from the videos he showed us. It's nice to hear that kind of vocal color with a modern aesthetic/ understanding of harmony.
    I also wanted to mention that how you felt about opera before hearing Marnie (not musically appealing) is how I felt about organ music before this class. When Nico asked if we wanted to hear organ music or a countertenor piece I was disappointed when the class settled on organ. But wow, I LOVED that piece! It had one of those rare moments when listening to it that you can only have once in a blue moon. Like my whole essence was awake to and captivated by this music. It was completely transformative. Unfortunately I couldn't find the piece anywhere online afterwards...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post about Nico and his use of non-vibrato! As it relates to a composer with less fame demanding no vibrato, I think that it is possible. I believe that one has the power to influence another, and if the music is undeniably a masterful work, it will be premiered some day. To the point of lessening the use of vibrato, I highly doubt it. Although, who knows what the turn of the century will bring.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also thought the variety of topics he covered were super interesting. I feel like it's so easy to just consider the work as some abstract monolith, but hearing about the human elements behind everything really, for me at least, puts into relief the creative decisions and is a good reminder of the push and pull of compromised that goes into any collaborative work!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yeah josie i agree with your comment! its always the back knowledge that makes it go a long way. its always nice to see fresh changes in music like opera

      Delete
  7. Opera is a genre which I’m not very familiar with, but your thoughts about Nico’s work is helpful to me. The non-vibrato voice is a cool point to think of as well, thanks for mentioning it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've always found the interplay between opera and personal nuance to be intriguing. I have not really ever seen opera as a medium capable of expressing the most complex of human emotion as opposed to broad caricatures of people, ideals, and themes. But I welcome the change.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bora Yoon - Musical Perspective

John Zorn writeup - What are the costs of 'irreverence'?