500 words | Jonathan Bailey Holland | social relevancy in music and performance.
As composers, the concept of social relevancy in our music comes
up often. For film composers, we are often asked to underscore films that carry
social commentary. It seems that art must be created to raise awareness for
some social issue, always. at least to me, that is how it feels. Because of
these art projects based in social change, often, people like to associate
creators with the social extremes of the world. but what does this have to do
with Jonathan Bailey Holland? I feel Mr Holland is an eloquent, and beautiful
story teller, taking advantage of the music world to make his social
commentaries the most effective.
This takes me to the piece “Synchrony.” While he never labeled it
as a social commentary, the subject matter, performance, and mixture of live
and recorded audio tells a different story. Sadly, in today’s world many people
fear being labeled an “activist” as it is a heavily stigmatized word. Even I,
if labeled an activist, would probably push back just a little. Synchrony, as Holland
puts it, reflects on his experiences, stating, “I, as an African-American
composer of classical music, live this duality every day.” This type of
reflection while not aggressively marching outside of a building nor carrying
sign and chanting does reach a special crowd. Being labeled as art and
performed in concert halls allow his message of duality in race relations,
class, morality and emotion to spread to a normally pacifist crowd.
To end the social commentary… commentary, I do feel that as
composers we have a special opportunity to raise awareness through mediums that
can speak to multiple types of people. His work was a great example of shedding
light on important social issues, while giving the consumer space to fully
digest the material, and possibly, come away with new perspectives on life.
What I also appreciated from his visit, was learning about his
approach to composing tonally. Not all his pieces relied on modal harmony, many
of them presented a mix of atonality and tonality that played with the ears. I
do not try to hide my slight distaste for atonality, and similarly, many in our
class did not try to hide their disrespect for tonal composers. After he
finished someone turned to me and said, “well that was the worst speaker yet.”
I think my jaw actually hit the floor. Mr Holland was one of my favorite
speakers from the last two semesters, and the fact that someone did not
appreciate his work was foreign to me. I have to ask myself, is it because he
used “uncool tonality” in his writing? Was it because the listener did not
agree with his social commentary? Or did they just not like his demeanor?
In conclusion, social activism through art and music is an
incredibly powerful tool in the game of influencing social change. We should
not be ashamed of our activism. And discovering ways to combine multiple styles
of composition opens new worlds of music. Dallin Burns
Dallin, what you write here regarding Jonathan's work and its social commentary as well as whom it may reach in a concert hall, really resonates with me. Some great thoughts here!
ReplyDeleteI think there isn't really atonality and tonality in conflict, but rather people in the art world who believe the art world should be exclusive only to certain types of music and composers, and people in the art world who want as many more people involved as possible.
ReplyDelete